Case LawHigh Court › Chs/1906/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Chs/1906/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-7, Mumbai v. Mukesh Wig

High Court 07 Jan 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Chs/1906/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-7, Mumbai v. Mukesh Wig
Date of order
07 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Chs/1906/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-7, Mumbai v. Mukesh Wig, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER OF SUMMONS NO.1906 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.853 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax-7,M.K. Road, Mumbai-20 ..Appellant V/s. Mukesh WigDeonar, Mumbai-88..Respondent Mr. Suresh Kumar for AppellantNone for Respondent CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJDATED : 7TH JANUARY, 2009. P.C.: 1.The Chamber of Summons is taken out would notbe maintainable and hence dismissed. 2.It will be open to the Appellant to take outappropriate proceedings considering that the assesseeexpired on 25.4.2006 to take steps to move this Courtfor setting aside the order of abetment and to bringthe Legal Heirs on record and the dismissal of thisChamber of Summons would not stand in the way of theappellant. 3.In view of this, Chamber summons is disposedof. ( R.S. MOHITE,J.)( F.I. REBELLO,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan