In Chs/192/2018 Of Shivaji Ramchandra Pawar (Huf) v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Range, Nashik, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 192 OF 2018
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 171 OF 2016
Mr. Mandar Vaidya i/b Ameet Palkar for the applicant / orig. appellant Mr. Sham Walve for the respondent
P.C.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J.
DATED : 6[th] APRIL, 2018.
1.This application has been taken out to amend the Income Tax Appeal in terms of the Schedule annexed to the Chamber Summons i.e. seeks to annex the grounds to appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) as well as the Tribunal. Amendment to be carried out within one week. Re-verification dispensed with. Amended copy of the appeal memo be served upon the respondents immediately thereafter.
2.The Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue