Chs/197/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Jagjitsingh Nagpal And S. Nagpal And 5 Ors
High Court
17 Jun 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Chs/197/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Jagjitsingh Nagpal And S. Nagpal And 5 Ors
Date of order
17 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Chs/197/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Jagjitsingh Nagpal And S. Nagpal And 5 Ors, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONCHAMBER SUMMONS NO.197 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.114 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s.Jagjitsingh Nagpal since deceased..RespondentAndSmt.Sudarshan Nagpal & Ors...Proposed respondents.
Mr.N.A.Kazi for appellant.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 17TH JUNE, 2009.
P.C. :-
1.In spite of service, nobody is present in the Chamber Summons on behalf of respondents. For the reasons stated in the affidavit, the Chamber Summons is made absolute.
2.Revenue is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the cause title of the appeal memo within two weeks and to serve the same on proposed respondents.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue