Case Law › High Court › Chs/387/2008 Of The Commissionerof Incom...

Chs/387/2008 Of The Commissionerof Income Tax-5 Mumbai v. M/S. Walchandnagar Ind. Limited

High Court 01 Aug 2011 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

01 Aug 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Chs/387/2008 Of The Commissionerof Income Tax-5 Mumbai v. M/S. Walchandnagar Ind. Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

sas IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.387 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.745 OF 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax-5, Mumbai ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Walchand Nagar Industries Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant. Ms. Vasanti B. Patel for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ.DATED : 1ST AUGUST, 2011 P.C. :- By this Chamber Summons, the revenue seeks to amend the Income Tax Appeal (Lod) No.1727 of 2006, which is tagged along with this Chamber Summons. Income Tax Appeal (Lod) No.1727 of 2006 has been dismissed on 4/3/2008 on the ground that the appellant has failed to comply with the directions contained in the conditional order passed by this Court on 11/2/2008. In this view of the matter, the Chamber Summons is disposed of as infructuous with no order as to costs. (A.A. SAYED, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.