Chs/464/2018 Of The West Coast Paper Mills Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1(3)(2), Mumbai
High Court
21 Jun 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Chs/464/2018 Of The West Coast Paper Mills Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1(3)(2), Mumbai
Date of order
21 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Chs/464/2018 Of The West Coast Paper Mills Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1(3)(2), Mumbai, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Rane* 1/2 * CHS—464-2018 (SR.16)Thursday, 21.6.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 464 OF 2018
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 462 OF 2017
The West Coast Paper MillsLimited, Mumbai
...Applicant
(Original Appellant)
IN THE MATTER OF :
The West Coast Paper Mills Ltd.….Appellantv/s.The Deputy Commissionerof Income-Tax, Range-1(3)(2),Mumbai. ….Respondent
* * * * *
Mr. Atul Jasani, Advocate for the applicant-original appellant.
Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE :-21ST JUNE, 2018.
P.C. :-
1.
This Chamber Summons has been taken out to
Rane
CHS—464-2018 (SR.16)Thursday, 21.6.2018
amend the Appeal Memo by bringing on record the subsequent order dated 7th December, 2017 of the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal rectifying the impugned order dated 14th September, 2016 of the Tribunal which is subject matter of challenge in the present Appeal. In the above view, the Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today. After amendment being carried out, amended copy to be served upon the respondent immediately thereafter. Re-verification dispensed with.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue