In Chs/498/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax -17 v. Mr. Hiren Dand, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDITION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.498 OF 2017IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1750 OF 2014
The Commissioner of Income-Tax17...ApplicantV/s.Mr.Hiren Dand...Respondent
.....
Mr.A.K.Saxena, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr.S.C.Tiwari with Ms.Rutuja Pawar, Advocate for theRespondent.
....
CORAM :S.V.GANGAPURWALA &A.M.BADAR JJ.
DATED :
12[th] July 2017.
P.C.
1The present Chamber Summons is moved seekingamendment to the grounds of Appeal and substituting substantialquestions of law.
2The appeal is at a nascent stage. Even otherwise therespondent has every right to controvert the grounds raised byway of amendment.
3Considering the above, the Chamber Summons foramendment, as prayed, is allowed and disposed of.
4Necessary amendment be carried out within twoweeks.
( A.M.BADAR J.)
( S.V.GANGAPURWALA J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue