Case Law › High Court › Chs/514/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Chs/514/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 21, Mumbai v. Shankar B. Poojary

High Court 23 Apr 2009 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

23 Apr 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Chs/514/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 21, Mumbai v. Shankar B. Poojary, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMON NO. 514 OF 2008IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 1099 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income-tax-21,Mumbai.V/s.Shankar B. Poojary.P.S.Sahadevan i/b. R.K.Sharma for the appellant.K.Shivram i/b. A.R.Shingh for the respondent. ... Appellant. ... Respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 23rd April 2009. P.C. :----. .Heard.2.By consent of parties, chamber summons ismade absolute. Amendment to be carried out in thecause title of the appeal within two weeks from today.Appeal be placed on board for admission after SummerVacation. No order as to costs.(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(V.C.DAGA J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.