In Chs/549/2006 Of Mrs. Gulshabanbanoo R. Mukhi v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-16(1), Mumbai And Anr, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 549 OF 2006ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 493 OF 2003
Mrs. Gulshanbanoo R. Mukhi... AppellantV/s.The Asstt. Commissioner of... RespondentsIncome Tax. & Anr.
Mr. A.K. Jasani for the appellant.Mr. A.K. Kotangale for the respondents.
CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE &V.R. KINGAONKAR,JJ.DATED : 8th August, 2006
.Heard Mr.Jasani in support of the Chamber
Summons and Mr. Kotangaleappears for therespondents. The Chamber Summons seeks to bring heirsof the original appellant on record. The appellanthas passed away after filing the appeal. The ChamberSummons is granted in terms of prayer clause (a). Theappeal will be appropriately amended by including theproposed amendments as mentioned in the schedule. Theamendment be carried out within two weeks and amendedcopies also be served on all the respondents.
2.The Chamber Summons made absolute as above.
[V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue