Chs/909/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -13 Mumbai v. Jethalal D. Mehta
High Court
22 Feb 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Chs/909/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -13 Mumbai v. Jethalal D. Mehta
Date of order
22 Feb 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Chs/909/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -13 Mumbai v. Jethalal D. Mehta, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.909 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.768 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
Jethalal D.Mehta
..Respondent.
Mr. A.S. Shivsharan for appellant.
Mr. B.V. Jhaveri for respondents.
CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 22ND FEBRUARY, 2010
P.C. :-
1.The Chamber summons has been taken out to bring the heirs of the respondent, who died on 20[th] November, 2006, on record. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the proposed respondents has no objection. Chamber summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) to (c). Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today.
2.Chamber summons is disposed of accordingly.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue