Chsw/117/2018 Of Destimony Enterprises Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle (6)(2)(1) And 2 Ors
High Court
06 Apr 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Chsw/117/2018 Of Destimony Enterprises Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle (6)(2)(1) And 2 Ors
Date of order
06 Apr 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Chsw/117/2018 Of Destimony Enterprises Ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle (6)(2)(1) And 2 Ors, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 116 OF 2018IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1247 OF 2015 WITHCHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 117 OF 2018IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1084 OF 2016
Destimoney Enterprises Ltd. .. Applicant
In the matter between
Destimoney Enterprises Ltd.
.. Petitioner
v/s.
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle -6(2)(1) & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Rajesh Poojary i/b MINT & CONFRERES i/ for the applicant / orig. petitioner Mr. A.R. Malhotra for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J.
P.C.
DATED : 6[th] APRIL, 2018.
1.These two chamber summons have been taken out by the official
liquidator of the petitioner company to seek leave to amend the two petitions in terms of the schedule annexed thereto i.e. by substituting
the official liquidator of the petitioner's company as a party in place of the petitioner and to make consequential amendment in the body of the
petitions. Leave granted.
2.Mr. Malhotra, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue states that he has no objection to the amendment being allowed.
3.Both the Chamber Summons are allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
4.Amendment to be carried out within a period of one week from today. Amended copy of the petition be served upon the respondents. Re-verification is dispensed with.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.