Churiwal Commercial Company Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), Kolkata And Ors
High Court
05 Sep 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Churiwal Commercial Company Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), Kolkata And Ors
Date of order
05 Sep 2023
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Churiwal Commercial Company Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), Kolkata And Ors, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In such facts and circumstances of the case and in view of availabilityof alternative remedy by way of appeal, I am not inclined to invoke theConstitutional Writ Jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia in this matter and accordingly this writ petition being WPO 1532 of2023 is dism...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
ORDER SHEETWPO/1532/2023IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTACONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTIONORIGINAL SIDE
CHURIWAL COMMERCIAL COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITEDVSINCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(1), KOLKATA AND ORS.
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDIN
Date: 5[th] September, 2023.
Appearance:Mr. Anil Kumar Dugar, Adv.…For the PetitionerMr. Aryak Dutt, Adv.…For the Respondents
The Court: Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties.
By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugnedassessment order dated 30[th] May, 2023 under Section 147 read with Section144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 relating to assessment year 2017-18which is an appealable order, on the ground that no effective opportunity ofcompliance of notice under Section 143(2) was given to the petitioner whichwas issued on 26[th] May, 2023 by which petitioner was asked to giveresponse to the same by 27[th] May, 2023. Though time to give response tothe notice under Section 143(2) was not very sufficient but it also appearsfrom record that the petitioner did not prayed for further time oradjournment for compliance of the said notice and it also appears fromrecord that the impugned assessment order was not passed on the verysame day by which petitioner was asked to give response rather it waspassed on 30[th] May, 2023, so petitioner could have filed response beforepassing the impugned assessment order which is an appealable order and
not only that, after order dated 30[th] May, 2023 petitioner filed this writpetition on 22[nd] August, 2023 which is after two months twenty two daysafter the passing of the impugned assessment order.
In such facts and circumstances of the case and in view of availabilityof alternative remedy by way of appeal, I am not inclined to invoke theConstitutional Writ Jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia in this matter and accordingly this writ petition being WPO 1532 of2023 is dismissed.
TR/
(MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.