Circle 1Tirunelveli v. V.sivasubramanianprop: Santhi Sweetstirunelveli Junction
High Court
12 Sep 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Circle 1Tirunelveli v. V.sivasubramanianprop: Santhi Sweetstirunelveli Junction
Date of order
12 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Circle 1Tirunelveli v. V.sivasubramanianprop: Santhi Sweetstirunelveli Junction, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: In that view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
T.C.A.No.901 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.09.2025
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICEAND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN
T.C.A.No.901 of 2018and C.M.P.No.21956 of 2018
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Circle 1Tirunelveli
Appellant
Vs
V.SivasubramanianProp: Santhi SweetsTirunelveli Junction
Respondent
PRAYER: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras “B” Bench, dated 31.5.2018 in ITA No.1941/Chny/2017.
For Appellant:
M/s.V.MahalingamP.E.R.Mangala SuvigaranStanding Counsel
______________
Page 1 of 4
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Heard learned counsel for the appellant/Revenue.
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the Revenue fairly submits
that it is a case having low tax effect. Therefore, in view of the Circular No.05/2024 dated 15.03.2024 and Circular No.09/2024, dated 17.09.2024, issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Government of India, the appellant/Revenue does not wish to proceed with the matter, though the questions of law proposed may be kept open for consideration in the appropriate matter.
3. In that view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 12.09.2025
Index: Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yes/Nobbr
______________
Page 2 of 4
To:
1. The Assistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “B” Bench, Chennai. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “B” Bench, Chennai.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Chennai-34. Chennai-34.
3. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-II, Madurai. Central Circle-II, Madurai.
______________
Page 3 of 4
______________
Page 4 of 4
T.C.A.No.901 of 2018
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE ANDG.ARUL MURUGAN,J.
bbr
T.C.A.No.901 of 2018
12.09.2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.