Case LawHigh Court › Circle 1Tirunelveli v. V.sivasubramanian...

Circle 1Tirunelveli v. V.sivasubramanianprop: Santhi Sweetstirunelveli Junction

High Court 12 Sep 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Circle 1Tirunelveli v. V.sivasubramanianprop: Santhi Sweetstirunelveli Junction
Date of order
12 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Circle 1Tirunelveli v. V.sivasubramanianprop: Santhi Sweetstirunelveli Junction, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: In that view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

T.C.A.No.901 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12.09.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICEAND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN T.C.A.No.901 of 2018and C.M.P.No.21956 of 2018 The Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1Tirunelveli Appellant Vs V.SivasubramanianProp: Santhi SweetsTirunelveli Junction Respondent PRAYER: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras “B” Bench, dated 31.5.2018 in ITA No.1941/Chny/2017. For Appellant: M/s.V.MahalingamP.E.R.Mangala SuvigaranStanding Counsel ______________ Page 1 of 4 JUDGMENT (Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the appellant/Revenue. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the Revenue fairly submits that it is a case having low tax effect. Therefore, in view of the Circular No.05/2024 dated 15.03.2024 and Circular No.09/2024, dated 17.09.2024, issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Government of India, the appellant/Revenue does not wish to proceed with the matter, though the questions of law proposed may be kept open for consideration in the appropriate matter. 3. In that view of the matter, the appeal stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 12.09.2025 Index: Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yes/Nobbr ______________ Page 2 of 4 To: 1. The Assistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “B” Bench, Chennai. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “B” Bench, Chennai. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Chennai-34. Chennai-34. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-II, Madurai. Central Circle-II, Madurai. ______________ Page 3 of 4 ______________ Page 4 of 4 T.C.A.No.901 of 2018 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE ANDG.ARUL MURUGAN,J. bbr T.C.A.No.901 of 2018 12.09.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan