Case Law › High Court › Cit-City Vi v. Hindalco Industries Ltd

Cit-City Vi v. Hindalco Industries Ltd

High Court 13 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

13 Mar 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Cit-City Vi v. Hindalco Industries Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.781 OF 2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL(L) NO.2818 OF 2008 CIT-City VI )..Appellant Versus Hindalco Industries Ltd., )..Respondents ---- Mr.J.S.Saluja for the appellant. Mr.P.R.Toprani for the respondents. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 13.3.2009. PC 1. This is a motion for condoning 503 days delay in filing of the appeal. A perusal of the affidavit-in-support indicates that the matter was sent to Counsel for preparing appeal memo on 21.2.2007 but the draft memo was received back 11 months later on 24.1.2008. Even thereater the appeal was filed after delay of further period of five months on 26.6.2008. In our opinion, the delay between the period 21.2.2007 and 24.1.2008 as well as between 25.2.2008 and 26.6.2008 has not been properly explained. The cause shown therefore, does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, motion dismissed. Consequently, appeal papers to be filed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.