Cit, Mumbai City Vii, Mumbai v. Voltas Ltd
High Court
12 Jun 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Cit, Mumbai City Vii, Mumbai v. Voltas Ltd
Date of order
12 Jun 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Cit, Mumbai City Vii, Mumbai v. Voltas Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1476 OF 2004
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1476 OF 2004
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1476 OF 2004
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.557 OF 2004
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.557 OF 2004
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.557 OF 2004
CIT, Mumbai City VII, Mumbai .. Appellant
V/s
Voltas Ltd. .. Respondents
Mr.A.D.Kango for the Appellant.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, &V.C.DAGA, JJ.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, &
V.C.DAGA, JJ.
ATE : 12th June, 2007.
DATE : 12th June, 2007.
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant.
Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of
Motion. For the reasons stated therein sufficient cause
is made out for condonation of delay. There is no case
of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part
of the Appellant. Hence, Notice of Motion is made
absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue