Case LawHigh Court › Cit v. Austin Engg. Co.ltd

Cit v. Austin Engg. Co.ltd

High Court 28 Jan 2004 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Cit v. Austin Engg. Co.ltd
Date of order
28 Jan 2004
Assessment year(s)
1991-92
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Cit v. Austin Engg. Co.ltd, the High Court (2004) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- CIT Versus AUSTIN ENGG.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 61 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- CIT Versus AUSTIN ENGG. CO.LTD. -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 61 of 1999 MR MANISH R BHATT for Petitioner No.1 MR SN SOPARKAR for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA Date of decision: 28/01/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH) �In this reference at the instance of the revenue, the following question of law is referred for our opinion in respect of assessment year 1991-92 :- "Whether the Tribunal is right in law and on facts in directing the AO to give relief u/s. 80I on the gross total income without reducing the same by allowance of sec.80HH relief ?" 2.�We have heard Mr MR Bhatt, learned standing counsel for the revenue and Mr SN Soparkar, learned counsel for the respondent-assessee. 3.�Our attention is invited to the decision rendered by us today in Income-tax Reference No. 53 of 1998 wherein we have held that for giving relief under Section 80I, no deduction is required to be made from the gross total income by reducing the same by allowance of deductions under Section 80HH. Following the said decision, we answer the question in the affirmative i.e. in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. �The reference accordingly stands disposed of. ����(M.S. Shah, J.) ����(A.M. Kapadia, J.)� sundar/-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan