Case Law › High Court › Cit v. Essar Teleholdings Ltd. (2018) 90...

Cit v. Essar Teleholdings Ltd. (2018) 90 Taxmann.com

High Court 02 Feb 2022 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

02 Feb 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Cit v. Essar Teleholdings Ltd. (2018) 90 Taxmann.com, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

MEERAMAHESHJADHAV Digitallysigned by1/1MEERAMAHESHJADHAVDate:2022.02.04 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY11:35:05+0530ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.55 OF 2018 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -1….Appellant V/s.Forbes & Company Ltd. …Respondent ---- Mr. Suresh Kumar for Appellant Mr. Paras Savla a/w Mr. Pratik Poddar i/b Mr. Atul K. Jasani for Respondent ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &N.J. JAMADAR, JJ DATED : 2[nd] FEBRUARY 2022 P.C. : 1Mr. Savla counsel for respondent tenders a compilation of judgments and submits that all proposed substantial questions of law are covered by the following 5 judgments: 1. CIT Vs. Essar Teleholdings Ltd. (2018) 90 taxmann.com 2 (SC) 2. Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. DCIT (2017)18 taxmann.com 111 (SC) 3. CIT Vs. Hindustan Organics Chemicals Ltd. (2014) 48taxmann.com 421 (Bom). 4. CIT Vs. Ghatge Patil Transports Ltd. (2015) 53taxmann.com 141 (Bom) 5. T.R.F. Ltd. Vs. CIT (2010) 190 Taxman 391 (SC) 2Mr. Suresh Kumar in fairness did not disagree. 3Therefore, Appeal disposed. (N. J. JAMADAR, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.