In Cit v. M/S. Maharanas, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CAT NO. 33 OF 2009 IN ITL NO. 20 OF 2009
(CIT vs. M/s. Maharanas)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & F.M. REIS, JJ. OCTOBER 16, 2009.
Heard Shri Parchure, learned counsel for the applicant/ appellant.
The questions sought to be raised are already covered. Hence, civil application is rejected.
JUDGE
*GS.
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.