Case LawHigh Court › Cit v. M/S V.r.v. Breweries & Bottling I...

Cit v. M/S V.r.v. Breweries & Bottling Industries Ltd

High Court 19 Aug 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Cit v. M/S V.r.v. Breweries & Bottling Industries Ltd
Date of order
19 Aug 2011
Assessment year(s)
2001-2002
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Cit v. M/S V.r.v. Breweries & Bottling Industries Ltd, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: 09.08.2011 % Judgment delivered on: 19.08.2011 + ITA No. 117/2008 CIT ...... Appellant Vs M/S V.R.V. BREWERIES & BOTTLING INDUSTRIES Ltd. ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant: Ms Rashmi Chopra, Advocate For the Respondent: Mr Ajay Vohra, Ms Kavita Jha & Mr Somnath Shukla, Advocates. CORAM :- HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER 1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? in the Digest ? RAJIV SHAKDHER, J 1. This appeal pertains to assessment year 2001-2002. The Tribunal by way of the impugned judgment has allowed the appeal of the assessee by following its own order for assessment years 1997-98, 1998-99 and 1999-2000. Therefore, in view of our decision in ITA Nos. 594/2005, 646/2005 and 559/2006 passed today, we have dismissed the appeals of the revenue. The same fate will follow in the captioned appeal. 2. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J AUGUST 19, 2011 kk/yg SANJAY KISHAN KAUL,J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan