Case Law › High Court › Cit v. M/S.dynamix Dairy Industries Pvt....

Cit v. M/S.dynamix Dairy Industries Pvt.ltd

High Court 11 Sep 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

11 Sep 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Cit v. M/S.dynamix Dairy Industries Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2400 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2400 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2400 OF 2006 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1501 OF 2005 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1501 OF 2005 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1501 OF 2005 CIT .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Dynamix Dairy Industries Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr.S.J.Mehta for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : 11h September, 2008 DATE : 11h September, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. The present Notice of Motion has been taken out by the Appellant for condonation of delay. However it appears that the earlier Notice of Motion No.3559 of 2005 which was also taken out by the Appellant for the very same purpose of condonation of delay was granted by this Court on 29.1.2008. Hence, in view of the aforesaid order dated 29.1.2008 passed in the Notice of Motion No.3559/2005, the present Notice of Motion bearing No.2400 of 2006 has become infructuous, and hence the Notice of Motion No.2400 of 2006 stands dismissed. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.