Cit v. R.narayanarao[[1
High Court
03 Dec 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Cit v. R.narayanarao[[1
Date of order
03 Dec 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Cit v. R.narayanarao[[1, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
I.T.T.A No.59 of 2004
JUDGMENT:-(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice L.Narasimha Reddy)
This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,1961 (for short, ‘the Act’) is filed against the order, dated11.03.2002, passed by the Visakhapatnam Bench of the IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal in I.T.A.No.142/Vizag/97.
Learned Standing Counsel for the appellant submits thatthis appeal is covered by the judgment of this Court in
CIT Vs. R.Narayanarao[[1]].
Therefore, the appeal is allowed and the order under appealshall be modified to the same extent as was done by this Court inthe judgment referred to above. There shall be no order as tocosts.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, filed in this appeal shall alsostand disposed of.
_______________________
L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J
Date:03.12.2014
________________________
CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J
Note: The Registry shall enclose a copy of the orderin CIT Vs. R.Narayanarao’s case to this order.kdl
[1]338 ITR 625
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue