Case LawHigh Court › City - 12 v. M/S.roopkala Export Corpora...

City - 12 v. M/S.roopkala Export Corporation

High Court 10 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
City - 12 v. M/S.roopkala Export Corporation
Date of order
10 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
1992-93
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In City - 12 v. M/S.roopkala Export Corporation, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.459 OF 2005 Commissioner of Income TaxCity - 12.. AppellantVersusM/s.Roopkala Export Corporation .. Respondent Mr.Parag Vyas i/b. R.K.Vaishampayan for appellantMr.P.S.Savla for respondent CORAM :SWATANTER KUMAR, CJ. &A.P.DESHPANDE, J.DATE:10th September 2008 P.C. .Learned Counsel for assessee submits thaton the question of law proposed in the presentappeal, the matter has already attained finalityin relation to the Assessment Year 1992-93 by theorder of the Tribunal in Income Tax AppealNo.1113 of 1996, which has been accepted by thedepartment and no appeal has been preferred. Asfar as other question is concerned, it is contended that it has also been decided andanswered against the Revenue by the Judgement ofthe Supreme Court in 295 ITR 454 (SC). The abovestatement is not disputed by the learned Counselfor the appellant. Hence, nothing survives inthe matter and the same is dismissed accordingly. ( CHIEF JUSTICE ) (A.P.Deshpande, J).
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan