City-15, Mumbai v. Chhotalal P. Patel (Huf
High Court
03 Dec 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
City-15, Mumbai v. Chhotalal P. Patel (Huf
Date of order
03 Dec 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In City-15, Mumbai v. Chhotalal P. Patel (Huf, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
VPH
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 1210 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-Tax, ... Appellant
City-15, Mumbai
Vs
Chhotalal P. Patel (HUF) ... Respondent
Mr. K. R. Choudhary, for the appellant.
CORAM: Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, &
V. C. DAGA, JJ.
DATED: DECEMBER 3, 2008.
P.C.:
----
. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the
appellant. The learned counsel for the appellant has
tendered the affidavit dated 3rd December, 2008
wherein the appellant has pointed out that the
appellant and its advocate had unfortunately not
properly stated before this Court, and that the
appellant was already served and the affidavit of
service was also filed. In view of the same, by our
earlier order dated 19th November 2008 wherein the
appellant was directed to pay costs of Rs.5,000/-,
stands withdrawn.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
- 2 -
As the value of tax assessment is less than Rs. four
lakhs, the learned counsel for the appellant seeks
leave to withdraw the appeal. Leave is granted.
Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Permissible
court-fee refund be given to the appellant.
Sd/- Sd/-
[ V.C. DAGA, J.] [ Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.