City 18, Mumbai v. Shri.g.t.rajani
High Court
05 Mar 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
City 18, Mumbai v. Shri.g.t.rajani
Date of order
05 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In City 18, Mumbai v. Shri.g.t.rajani, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal.
Decision: Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.665 OF 2003
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.665 OF 2003
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.665 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income Tax
City 18, Mumbai .. Appellant
V/s
Shri.G.T.Rajani, .. Respondent
Mr.R.G.Bhat for the Appellant.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN&
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 5th March, 2007.
DATE : 5th March, 2007.
DATE : 5th March, 2007.
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. The learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw this Appeal. Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. Permissible Court fees
be refunded to the Appellant as per the rules.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue