City-22, Mumbai v. M/S.intersubra, Mumbai
High Court
28 Aug 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
City-22, Mumbai v. M/S.intersubra, Mumbai
Date of order
28 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In City-22, Mumbai v. M/S.intersubra, Mumbai, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
AGK 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICITON
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.785 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
City-22, Mumbai .. Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Intersubra, Mumbai .. Respondent.
None for the appellant.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 28TH AUGUST, 2007.
P.C. :
1. When the matter is called out, none present
on behalf of the appellant-revenue.
2. Appeal dismissed for non prosecution.
3. It will be open to the Commissioner of
Income Tax to take appropriate action against the
concerned officer who is responsible to look after
the file.
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue