City-22 v. M/S.channel Finance
High Court
25 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
City-22 v. M/S.channel Finance
Date of order
25 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In City-22 v. M/S.channel Finance, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: Hence, the appeal is rejected.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
The Commissioner of Income TaxCity-22...Appellantvs.M/s.Channel Finance....Respondent.
---
Mr.N.A.Kazi, for Appellant.
CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: 25[th] July, 2008.
P.C.:-
1.Heard the learned Counsel appearing forappellant. Perusal of the order of the Tribunalshows that the tribunal has held that Assessingofficer has taken a possible view of the matter, andtherefore, the order should not have been revised.After hearing the learned Counsel appearing forappellant, we do not find that any question of law
arises. Hence, the appeal is rejected.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
---
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue