City - 3, Mumbai v. M/S.ornamental Trading Enter
High Court
08 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
City - 3, Mumbai v. M/S.ornamental Trading Enter
Date of order
08 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In City - 3, Mumbai v. M/S.ornamental Trading Enter, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICITON
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2995 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.671 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
City - 3, Mumbai .. Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Ornamental Trading Enter-
prises Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.
Mr.J.D. Mistry with Mr.Raj Darak for the respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 8TH OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C. :
1. Delay is less than 200 days. Considering
the practical difficulties which the Department was
facing including referring the matters to the Law
Department, Government of India for drafting the
appeal memo and considering the affidavit in support
of the notice of motion, in our opinion, cause shown
would amount to sufficient cause. Hence, delay
condoned.
2. Office to register the appeal.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue