City-Iv, Bombay v. Upendra M.dalal
High Court
18 Jan 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
City-Iv, Bombay v. Upendra M.dalal
Date of order
18 Jan 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In City-Iv, Bombay v. Upendra M.dalal, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Appeal therefore stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.375 OF 2004
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.375 OF 2004
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.375 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax
City-IV, Bombay .. Appellant
V/s
Upendra M.Dalal .. Respondent
Mr.Pankaj Kapoor for the Appellant.
Mr.B.D.Damodar for the Respondent.
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 18.01.2005.
DATE : 18.01.2005.
DATE : 18.01.2005.
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The
issue raised in this Appeal is squarely covered by the
judgment in the case of Cadell Weaving Mill Company
Cadell Weaving Mill CompanyLimited V/s. Commissioner of Income Tax - 249 ITR 265.
Limited V/s. Commissioner of Income Tax - 249 ITR 265.
Under these circumstances, nothing further survives in
this Appeal. Appeal therefore stands dismissed.
2. The learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that
the issue is now pending before the Hon’ble Supreme
Court.
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.