Case LawHigh Court › City-Iv, Bombay v. Upendra M.dalal

City-Iv, Bombay v. Upendra M.dalal

High Court 18 Jan 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
City-Iv, Bombay v. Upendra M.dalal
Date of order
18 Jan 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In City-Iv, Bombay v. Upendra M.dalal, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: Appeal therefore stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.375 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.375 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.375 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax City-IV, Bombay .. Appellant V/s Upendra M.Dalal .. Respondent Mr.Pankaj Kapoor for the Appellant. Mr.B.D.Damodar for the Respondent. CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 18.01.2005. DATE : 18.01.2005. DATE : 18.01.2005. P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The issue raised in this Appeal is squarely covered by the judgment in the case of Cadell Weaving Mill Company Cadell Weaving Mill CompanyLimited V/s. Commissioner of Income Tax - 249 ITR 265. Limited V/s. Commissioner of Income Tax - 249 ITR 265. Under these circumstances, nothing further survives in this Appeal. Appeal therefore stands dismissed. 2. The learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the issue is now pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. (S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan