Case LawHigh Court › City Vi, Mumbai v. M/S.goodlass Nerolac...

City Vi, Mumbai v. M/S.goodlass Nerolac Paints Ltd

High Court 05 Mar 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
City Vi, Mumbai v. M/S.goodlass Nerolac Paints Ltd
Date of order
05 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In City Vi, Mumbai v. M/S.goodlass Nerolac Paints Ltd, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal.

Decision: Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.692 OF 2003 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.692 OF 2003 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.692 OF 2003 The Commissioner of Income Tax, City VI, Mumbai .. Appellant V/s M/s.Goodlass Nerolac Paints Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.A.Kotangale for the Appellant. Mr.S.J.Mehta for the Respondent. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN& CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 5th March, 2007. DATE : 5th March, 2007. DATE : 5th March, 2007. P.C.:- 1. In view of disposal of the Notice of Motion No.2111/2003, the learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw this Appeal. Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. Permissible Court fees be refunded to the Appellant as per the rules. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan