Case LawHigh Court › City Vii v. M/S Procter & Gamble India L...

City Vii v. M/S Procter & Gamble India Ltd

High Court 11 Jun 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
City Vii v. M/S Procter & Gamble India Ltd
Date of order
11 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In City Vii v. M/S Procter & Gamble India Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1557 OF 2008 in INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1097 of 2008The Commissioner of Income TaxCity VII..AppellantVs. M/s Procter & Gamble India Ltd .. Respondent Mr.A.D.Kango for AppellantNone for Respondent P.C. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Bythis notice of motion, the appellant is seekingcondonation of 324 days delay caused in filing theappeal. 2. Perused the affidavit in support of the Noticeof motion. It appears that though the last datefor filing the appeal was 21.5.07 and theCommissioner of Income Tax had granted approval on17.5.07 the appeal came to be filed belatedly on11.4.08. However,the time taken is almost a yearfor getting the memo of appeal drafted. We arenot all satisfied with the reasons given forcondonation of delay. No sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Hence, Notice ofmotion stands dismissed. {A.V.Nirgude, J) (Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan