In City Vii v. M/S Procter & Gamble India Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1557 OF 2008
in
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1097 of 2008The Commissioner of Income TaxCity VII..AppellantVs.
M/s Procter & Gamble India Ltd .. Respondent
Mr.A.D.Kango for AppellantNone for Respondent
P.C.
1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Bythis notice of motion, the appellant is seekingcondonation of 324 days delay caused in filing theappeal.
2. Perused the affidavit in support of the Noticeof motion. It appears that though the last datefor filing the appeal was 21.5.07 and theCommissioner of Income Tax had granted approval on17.5.07 the appeal came to be filed belatedly on11.4.08. However,the time taken is almost a yearfor getting the memo of appeal drafted. We arenot all satisfied with the reasons given forcondonation of delay. No sufficient cause is made
out for condonation of delay. Hence, Notice ofmotion stands dismissed.
{A.V.Nirgude, J)
(Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.