Case LawHigh Court › C.kamaraj v. The Commissioner Of Income...

C.kamaraj v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)

High Court 17 Feb 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
C.kamaraj v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
17 Feb 2014
Assessment year(s)
2010-11
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In C.kamaraj v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED : 17.02.2014CORAM THE HONOURBLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN W.P(MD).No.20897 of 2013 andM.P.(MD).No.1 of 2013 **** C.Kamaraj...Petitioner Vs 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), No.44, Williams Road, Cantonment, Tiruchirappalli-620 001. 2.The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, No.44, Williams Road, Cantonment, Tiruchirappalli-620 001. 3.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circel-IV, Trichy, No.44, Williams Road, Cantonment, Tiruchirappalli-620 001. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indiafor the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent todispose of the Appeal pending on his file in ITA No.102 of 2013-14relating to the assessment year 2010-11 within a specified time frame andfurther direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents not to initiate any coerciveaction for payment of the disputed tax. For Petitioner : Mr.Joseph PrabakarFor Respondents : Mr.R.Krishnamoorthy ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learnedcounsel for the respondents by referring paragraph:8 of the counteraffidavit, submitted that the very appeal itself of the petitioner wouldbe disposed of, in the middle of March,2014 and the present Writ Petitionis unwarranted. 2.Recording the said fact, this Writ Petition is disposed ofdirecting the respondents to dispose of the very appeal by March'2014.Till then, the respondents are directed not to initiate any coerciveaction for payment of the disputed tax. Needless to say that thepetitioner will co-operate with the respondents to dispose of the appeal,as scheduled. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition isclosed. No costs. sd/- Assistant Registrar (AE) /True copy/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Sub Assistant Registrar 2 ssmTo 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), No.44, Williams Road, Cantonment, Tiruchirappalli-620 001. 2.The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, No.44, Williams Road, Cantonment, Tiruchirappalli-620 001. No.44, Williams Road, Cantonment, Tiruchirappalli-620 001. 3.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circel-IV, Trichy, No.44, Williams Road, Cantonment, Tiruchirappalli-620 001. Circel-IV, Trichy, No.44, Williams Road, Cantonment, Tiruchirappalli-620 001. +1CC to Mr.Joseph Prabakar,Advocate in SR.No.10206 +1CC to Mr.R.Krishnamoorthy,Advocate in SR.No.10231 rg.10.03.2014 2p/6c. W.P(MD).No.20897 of 2013 17.02.2014
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan