Case LawHigh Court › Clifford Chance v. The Deputy Commisione...

Clifford Chance v. The Deputy Commisioner Of

High Court 04 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Clifford Chance v. The Deputy Commisioner Of
Date of order
04 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Clifford Chance v. The Deputy Commisioner Of, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Issue: After hearing the parties in our opinion the question would arise and accordingly we vary the order dated 9th August, 2004 and add the question No.4 as under:- "On the facts & in the circumstances of the Appellant being a law firm providing legal advice and being remunerated on an hourly rate basis,...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. O.O.C.J. NOTICE OF MOTIUON NO.2380 OF 2007 IN TAX APPEAL (INCOME TAX) NO.182 OF 2002 Clifford Chance ..Appellant Versus The Deputy Commisioner of Income Tax, Circle 2(6),Mumbai...Respondent Mr. Harish Salvi i/b. S.K. Srivastava & Co., for the Appellant. Mr.Parag Vyas for Respondents. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO R.V. MORE,JJ. DATED : 4th July, 2007 P.C. P.C. . This Court by its order dated 9th August,2004 had framed three questions as substantial questions of law. By the present Motion the Appellants contend that another question has to be framed as set out in para.5 of the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. After hearing the parties in our opinion the question would arise and accordingly we vary the order dated 9th August, 2004 and add the question No.4 as under:- "On the facts & in the circumstances of the Appellant being a law firm providing legal advice and being remunerated on an hourly rate basis, whether the ITAT erred in law in not ascertaining the income of the Appellant in India on the basis of the services rendered in India as measured by the billed hours of work done in India?" . Notice of Motion disposed of accordingly. Liberty to the parties to apply for early hearing after two months. F.I. REBELLO, J) (F.I. REBELLO R.V. MORE, J) (R.V. MORE, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan