Cmapl/26/2017 Of Principal Comnr. Of Income Tax v. United Friends Builders Pvt.ltd.,Cuttack
High Court
23 Dec 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Cmapl/26/2017 Of Principal Comnr. Of Income Tax v. United Friends Builders Pvt.ltd.,Cuttack
Date of order
23 Dec 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Cmapl/26/2017 Of Principal Comnr. Of Income Tax v. United Friends Builders Pvt.ltd.,Cuttack, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
02. 23.12.2019
SKG
Heard learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department-petitioner.
Defects pointed out by the Office stands ignored. This application has been filed for restoration of I.T.A. No.125 of 2004, which was dismissed on 21.12.2016 for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 07.01.2014 passed in the said appeal.
Learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department states that the issue involved in the appeal i.e. I.T.A. No.125 of 2004 is covered by the Circular No.17/2019, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, dated 08.08.2019 and, therefore, the restoration application may be allowed and the main appeal may be disposed of in terms of the aforesaid Circular.
Only on the basis of such submission made, the application for restoration is allowed by condoning the delay in filing the restoration application.
I.T.A. No.125 of 2004 is restored to its original file. CMAPL is accordingly disposed of.
.……..........………… ( K.S. Jhaveri ) Chief Justice
……………….…….. ( K.R. Mohapatra ) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.