Case Law › High Court › Cmp/10625/2023 Of The Pr. Commissioner O...

Cmp/10625/2023 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Shri Parthiban

High Court 07 Aug 2024 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · hc_cis_mas

Parties

Date of order

07 Aug 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Cmp/10625/2023 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Shri Parthiban, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

C.M.P.No.10625 of 2023inT.C.A.SR.No.42571 of 2023 C.M.P.No.10625 of 2023 in T.C.A.SR.No.42571 of 2023 R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDC.SARAVANAN J. [Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 23 days in filing of the above tax case appeal. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 3. Though notice had been directed to be served which was returned as unclaimed, when that being so, it can be construed as a service and the delay is also 23 days. 3. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned. 4. Registry is directed to number the tax case appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. vji [R.S.K., J.] [C.S.N., J.] 07.08.2024 C.M.P.No.10625 of 2023inT.C.A.SR.No.42571 of 2023 R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDC.SARAVANAN J. vji C.M.P.No.10625 of 2023 inT.C.A.SR.No.42571 of 2023 07.08.2024

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.