Case Law › High Court › Cmp/12387/2016 Of M/S. Cognizant Technol...

Cmp/12387/2016 Of M/S. Cognizant Technology v. The Income-Tax Officer (Tds)

High Court 03 Aug 2016 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · hc_cis_mas

Parties

Date of order

03 Aug 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Cmp/12387/2016 Of M/S. Cognizant Technology v. The Income-Tax Officer (Tds), the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

C.M.P.No.12387 of 2016inTax Case Appeal SR.No.88956 of 2014 S.Manikumar, Ja n dD.Krishnakumar, J Heard Mr.Venkatanarayanan, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Though the reasons assigned in the supporting affidavit are not satisfactory, considering the issues raised in the Tax Appeal, we are inclined to condone the delay of 628 days in representing Tax Case Appeal SR.No.88956 of 2014, subject to the condition the petitioner pays Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred only) to the Tamil Nadu Advocate Clerks' Association, within a period of one week from today. It is made clear that if cost is not paid, within the above said period, M.P.No.12387 of 2016 would stand dismissed, without any further reference to this Court.On payment of costs and filing of memo thereof, Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. (S.M.K.,J) (D.K.K.,J) 3[rd] August 2016 mvs. S.MANIKUMAR,J A N D D.KRISHNAKUMAR,J mvs. Civil Miscellaneous Petition No.12387 of 2016inTax Case (Appeal) SR. No.88956 of 2014

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.