Case LawHigh Court › Cmp/12820/2023 Of Bharatiya Nabhikiya Vi...

Cmp/12820/2023 Of Bharatiya Nabhikiya Vidyut Nigam Ltd v. The Deputy Commisioner Of Income Tax

High Court 12 Jul 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Cmp/12820/2023 Of Bharatiya Nabhikiya Vidyut Nigam Ltd v. The Deputy Commisioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
12 Jul 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Cmp/12820/2023 Of Bharatiya Nabhikiya Vidyut Nigam Ltd v. The Deputy Commisioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

C.M.P.No.12820 of 2023 R.MAHADEVAN, J.ANDMOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. (Order of the court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J.) This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to condone the delay of 1166 days in filing the above appeal. 2.Mr.T.Ravikumar, learned counsel, who takes notice for the respondent submitted that he has no objection in condoning the delay. 3.We perused the affidavit filed in support of this petition, wherein, the petitioner has stated that in the process of availing alternate remedy before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, the delay in filing the present appeal has occurred, which is neither wilful nor wanton. Stating so, the petitioner prayed for condonation of delay. 4.Having regard to the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition and being satisfied with the same, the delay is condoned and this petition is accordingly ordered. [R.M.D., J.] [M.S.Q., J.] 12.07.2023 nsd Note: The Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. R.MAHADEVAN, J.ANDMOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.nsd C.M.P.No.12820 of 2023in T.C.A.No.SR54683 of 2023 12.07.2023
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan