Case LawHigh Court › Cmp/13628/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Cmp/13628/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 v. M/S.l & T Infrastructure

High Court 31 Aug 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Cmp/13628/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 v. M/S.l & T Infrastructure
Date of order
31 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Cmp/13628/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 v. M/S.l & T Infrastructure, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
S.Manikumar, Ja n dD.Krishnakumar, J Heard Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the petitioner. 2. Though the reasons assigned in the supporting affidavit are not satisfactory, considering the issues raised in the Tax Case Appeal, which require to be adjudicated, we are inclined to condone the delay of 436 days in representing Tax Case Appeal SR.No.26981 of 2015, subject to the condition, the petitioner pays a sum of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five hundred only) to the Little Flower Convent Higher Secondary School for the Blind, No.4/127, G.N.Chetty Road, Thousand Lights, Chennai-600 006, Phone: 044-28269618 and 28269582, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that if cost is not paid, within the above said period, C.M.P.No.13628 of 2016 would stand dismissed, without any further reference to this Court. On payment of costs and filing of memo thereof, Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order. (S.M.K.,J) (D.K.K.,J) 31/8/2016
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan