Case LawHigh Court › Cmp/13829/2020 Of Polaris Consulting And...

Cmp/13829/2020 Of Polaris Consulting And Services Ltd v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-5

High Court 23 Dec 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Cmp/13829/2020 Of Polaris Consulting And Services Ltd v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-5
Date of order
23 Dec 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Cmp/13829/2020 Of Polaris Consulting And Services Ltd v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-5, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

CMP.No.13829 of 2020 in TCA.No.292 of 2018 T.SIVAGNANAM,JANDV.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN,J Order of the Court was made by T.SIVAGNANAM,J We have heard Mr.N.V.Balaji, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.R.Hemalatha, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent. 2. This is a petition filed by the petitioner seeking to modify paragraphs 13 and 14 of the judgment dated 11.9.2020 in TCA.No.292 of 2018. The reason for filing the above petition is on the ground that substantial question No.4 was stated to have been not adjudicated by the Tribunal. 3. However, it has been ascertained by the assessee that the said question had subsequently been adjudicated by the Tribunal on a miscellaneous petition filed by the assessee and the decision went in favour of the assessee. The Revenue is on appeal against the said order in the miscellaneous petition and the same is pending before this Court in TCA.No.310 of 2014. In the light of the pendency of the appeal filed by the Revenue, in our considered view, no modification is required and the observations made in paragraph 13 and 14 of the judgment dated 11.9.2020 in TCA.No.292 of 2018 may not require any modification, as the issue has become academic and the Revenue shall prosecute their appeal, which is now pending before the Hon'ble T.S.SIVAGNANAM,JANDV.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN,J RS Division Bench in TCA.No. 310 of 2014. 4. Mrs.R.Hemalatha, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the Revenue is right in her submission that after the judgment is pronounced, the Court would not have jurisdiction to modify the judgment except by way of a review and that too, only when there is an error apparent on the face of the judgment. 5. With the above observation, CMP.No.13829 of 2020 stands disposed of. 23.12.2020 CMP.No.13829 of 2020in TCA.No.292 of 2018
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan