Cmp/14451/2020 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 v. M/S.idea Cellular Ltd
High Court
20 Dec 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Cmp/14451/2020 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 v. M/S.idea Cellular Ltd
Date of order
20 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Cmp/14451/2020 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 v. M/S.idea Cellular Ltd, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1/1
CMP.No.14451 of 2020 in TCA.SR.No.115882 of 2019
CMP.No.14451 of 2020
in
TCA.SR.No.115882 of 2019
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
ANDMOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
This petition is filed by the petitioner / appellant seeking to condone the delay of 214 days in filing the above TCA.SR.No.14451 of 2020.
2. Heard both sides. The learned Counsel appearing for the respondent has no serious objection for ordering this petition.
3. Having regard to the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition and also considering the no objection expressed on the side of the respondent, the delay is condoned and this petition is ordered accordingly.
[R.M.D., J.] [M.S.Q., J.]
20.12.2021
AT
Note : Registry is directed to number the Appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list it for admission, after printing the name of Mr.K. Ravi Kumar, as counsel for the sole Respondent.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue