Cmp/1534/2023 Of Rahamathula Askar v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
30 Jan 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Cmp/1534/2023 Of Rahamathula Askar v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
30 Jan 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Cmp/1534/2023 Of Rahamathula Askar v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Decision: Considering the fact that the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition are satisfying and also, there is no objection from the side of respondent for allowing this petition, delay is condoned and this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. mrr (R.M.D., J.) (M.S.Q., J.)30.01...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
C.M.P.No.1534 of 2023
R.MAHADEVAN, J.andMOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
(Order of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J.)
This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed for condoning the delay of 79 days in filing the above T.C.A.SR.No.140299 of 2019.
2. Heard Mr.T.N.Seetharaman, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Swaminathan, Senior Standing counsel appearing for the respondent, who has no objection to this petition being allowed.
3. Considering the fact that the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition are satisfying and also, there is no objection from the side of respondent for allowing this petition, delay is condoned and this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.
mrr
(R.M.D., J.) (M.S.Q., J.)30.01.2023
Note to Registry:
Number the above T.C.A.SR.No.140299 of 2019, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for hearing after printing the name of Mr.M.Swaminathan as Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent.
1/2
2/2
R.MAHADEVAN, J.andMOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.mrr
C.M.P.No.1534 of 2023in T.C.A.SR.No.140299 of 2019
30.01.2023
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue