In Cmp/15867/2023 Of Shri Kishore Nanwani v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
R.MAHADEVAN, J.ANDMOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
These civil miscellaneous petitions have been filed by the petitioners seeking to condone the delay of 209 days in re-presenting the above appeals.
2.Mr.M.Swaminathan,learned
Senior Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondent and submitted that he has no objection in condoning the delay.
3.Having regard to the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions and being satisfied with the same, the delay is condoned and these petitions are accordingly ordered.
nsd
Note: The Registry is directed to number the appeals, if they are otherwise in order.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue