Case Law › High Court › Cmp/1863/2025 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Cmp/1863/2025 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Appeals v. Saravana Selvarathnam Trading And Manufacturing Private Limited

High Court 30 Jan 2025 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · hc_cis_mas

Parties

Date of order

30 Jan 2025

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Cmp/1863/2025 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Appeals v. Saravana Selvarathnam Trading And Manufacturing Private Limited, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

(Order of the Court was made by Dr.ANITA SUMANTH.,J.) Mr.Akhil Bansali, learned counsel who undertakes to file vakalat for the respondents states that he has entered appearance for the same assessee in connected Writ Appeals, being W.A.Nos.24 and 25 of 2025. On instructions, he submits that there is no objection put forth for condonation of delay of 162 days in filing the Writ Appeal. 2. Hence recording the submission of the learned counsel for the respondents and also for the reasons stated in the affidavit accompanying the petition, the delay of 162 days in filing the Writ Appeal is condoned and this Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. 3. Registry is directed to number the Writ Appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same for admission on 04.02.2025 along with the aforesaid connected Writ Appeals. [A.S.M.,J][G.A.M.,J] sl 30.01.2025

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.