Cmp/19502/2021 Of P.t.rajan v. The Income Tax Settlement Commission
High Court
09 Mar 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Cmp/19502/2021 Of P.t.rajan v. The Income Tax Settlement Commission
Date of order
09 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Cmp/19502/2021 Of P.t.rajan v. The Income Tax Settlement Commission, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Having been satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, delay is condoned and this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
C.M.P.No.19502 of 2021
in W.A.SR.No.99985 of 2021
R.MAHADEVAN, J.
andJ.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
(Order of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J.)
This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner for condoning the delay of 178 days in filing the above writ appeal.
2. Heard both sides.
3. Having been satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, delay is condoned and this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.
(R.M.D.,J.) (J.S.N.P.,J.)09.03.2022
mrr
Note:Registry is directed to number the above W.A.SR.No.99985 of 2021, if above W.A.SR.No.99985 of 2021, if it is otherwise in order and list the
same after two weeks along with WA Nos.1145/2018 and 2911/2021.WA Nos.1145/2018 and 2911/2021.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue