In Cmp/19917/2022 Of M/S Prime Textile Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is allowed. [S.V.N., J.] [C.S.N., J.] 28.11.2022 arr Note: (i) Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments and post next week.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
in
T.C.No.643 of 2020
C.M.P.No.19917 of 2022
inT.C.No.643 of 2020
S.VAIDYANATHAN, J.
andC.SARAVANAN, J.
Being satisfied with the reasons
stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is allowed.
[S.V.N., J.] [C.S.N., J.]
28.11.2022
arr
Note: (i) Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments and post next week.
(ii) Registry is directed to print the name of Mr.Swaminathan for Respondent
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.P.No.19917 of 2022inT.C.No.643 of 2020
S.VAIDYANATHAN, J.andSENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.arr
Contempt Petition No. 34 of 2022
C.M.P.No.19917 of 2022inT.C.No.643 of 2020
29.09.2022
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue