In Cmp/20265/2022 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.sutherland Global Services Private Limited, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is allowed and the delay of 902 days in representing the Appeal is condoned. [S.V.N., J.] [C.S.N., J.] 28.11.2022 arr Note: Registry is directed to number the Appeal, it is otherwise in order an...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C.M.P.No.20265 of 2022
inT.C.A.sr.No.2117 of 2020
C.M.P.No.20265 of 2022
inT.C.A.sr.No.2117 of 2020
S.VAIDYANATHAN, J.andC.SARAVANAN, J.
Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is allowed and the delay of 902 days in representing the Appeal is condoned.
[S.V.N., J.] [C.S.N., J.]
28.11.2022
arr
Note: Registry is directed to number the Appeal, it is otherwise in order and post for admission.
C.M.P.No.20265 of 2022inT.C.A.sr.No.2117 of 2020
S.VAIDYANATHAN, J.andSENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.arr
Contempt Petition No. 34 of 2022
C.M.P.No.20265 of 2022inT.C.A.sr.No.2117 of 2020
29.09.2022
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue