Case LawHigh Court › Cmp/20592/2023 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Cmp/20592/2023 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Doowan Automotive Systems India Pvt Ltd

High Court 09 Jan 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Cmp/20592/2023 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Doowan Automotive Systems India Pvt Ltd
Date of order
09 Jan 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Cmp/20592/2023 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Doowan Automotive Systems India Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

C.M.P.No.20592 of 2023IN T.C.A.SR.No.106072 of 2022 R.MAHADEVAN, J.ANDMOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. (Order of the court was made by R.Mahadevan, J.) This miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to condone the delay of 1692 days in filing the above tax case appeal. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the affidavit filed in support of this petition, wherein, it has been stated that that the impugned order dated 18.08.2017 was received by the petitioner on 13.10.2017, against which, the appellant preferred an appeal, on the recommendations of the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO). However, the TPO failed to communicate the remarks to the CIT, who suggested the appellant filing of further appeal before the High Court and therefore, the present appeal could not be filed within the prescribed time limit. Thus, there was a delay of 1692 days occasioned in filing the appeal, which is neither wilful nor wanton and hence, the delay may be condoned. 3. Having regard to the reasons stated by the petitioner, which appears to be bona fide, considering the huge delay in filing the appeal, we are inclined to condone the delay subject to payment of costs of Rs.2,000/- by the petitioner to the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court, Madras, within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. R.MAHADEVAN, J. AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. gya 4. Upon production of receipt for payment of costs, this miscellaneous petition stands ordered. gya [R.M.D., J.] [M.S.Q., J.] 09.01.2024 C.M.P.No.20592 of 2023INT.C.A.SR.No.106072 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan