In Cmp/21326/2024 Of M/S.tamilnadu Minerals Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: Having considered the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of the petitions, though we are inclined to allow these petitions, since the delay is more than 1900 days, we are inclined to allow these petitions on payment of Rs.5000/- each with respect to each of the petitions towards the T...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C.M.P.Nos.21326 & 21327 of 2024 inT.C.A.SR.Nos.38895 & 38896 of 2019
R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDC.SARAVANAN J.
[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.]
This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 1923 days in representing the above appeals.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
3. Having considered the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of the petitions, though we are inclined to allow these petitions, since the delay is more than 1900 days, we are inclined to allow these petitions on payment of Rs.5000/- each with respect to each of the petitions towards the Tamil Nadu Advocate Clerks Association within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
4. On such payment, Registry is directed to verify the main Tax Case Appeals appeals and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order.
[R.S.K., J.] [C.S.N., J.]
30.09.2024
KST
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue