In Cmp/26869/2023 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Suryavaradhan Estate Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICEandMOHAMMED SHAFFIQ,J.
Thesecivilmiscellaneous
petitions have been filed by the petitioners to condone the delay of 160 days in filing the above tax case appeals.
HeardMr.J.Narayanaswamy, learned Panel Counsel for the petitionersandMr.A.S.Sriraman,
learned counsel for the respondent.
Satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the miscellaneous petitions, the delay of 160 days in filing the appeals is condoned.
The civil miscellaneous petitions are ordered accordingly.
The Registry is directed to number the appeals, if they are otherwise found to be in order.
sra
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue