Cmp/3288/2024 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 3 v. M/S.vanishita Ispat Udygo Private Ltd
High Court
07 Aug 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Cmp/3288/2024 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 3 v. M/S.vanishita Ispat Udygo Private Ltd
Date of order
07 Aug 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Cmp/3288/2024 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 3 v. M/S.vanishita Ispat Udygo Private Ltd, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
C.M.P.No.3288 of 2024
inT.C.A.SR.No.12990 of 2024
C.M.P.No.3288 of 2024 inT.C.A.SR.No.12990 of 2024
R.SURESH KUMAR, J.
AND
C.SARAVANAN J.
[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.]
This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the
delay of 300 days in filing the above tax case appeal.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
3. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in
support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.
4. Registry is directed to number the tax case appeal and place the
same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order.
vji
[R.S.K., J.] [C.S.N., J.] 07.08.2024
C.M.P.No.3288 of 2024inT.C.A.SR.No.12990 of 2024R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDC.SARAVANAN J.
vji
C.M.P.No.3288 of 2024inT.C.A.SR.No.12990 of 2024
07.08.2024
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue