Cmp/3452/2020 Of Mr.vijay Kumar Maheswari v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
21 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Cmp/3452/2020 Of Mr.vijay Kumar Maheswari v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
21 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Cmp/3452/2020 Of Mr.vijay Kumar Maheswari v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
C.M.P.Nos.3452, 3456 & 3454 of 2020in
T.C.A.Nos.SR53386, SR53394 & SR53395 of 2019
N.KIRUBAKARAN, J.andP.VELMURUGAN, J.
(Order of the Court was made by N.KIRUBAKARAN,J.)
These petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 277 days in
representing the above appeals.
2.Heard the parties. This Court is convinced with the reasons stated
in the respective affidavits filed in support of the respective petitions to condone the delay of 277 days in representing the above appeals and accordingly, these petitions are ordered.
ay
(N.K.K.,J.) (P.V.,J.) 21.02.2020
N.KIRUBAKARAN, J.andP.VELMURUGAN, J.ayC.M.P.Nos.3452, 3456 & 3454 of 2020inT.C.A.Nos.SR53386, SR53394 & SR53395 of 2019
Dated:21.02.2020
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue