In Cmp/3457/2018 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. S 9787 K. Kondappanaick, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and on being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, we allow this Civil Miscellaneous Petition and condone the delay.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C.M.P.No.3457 of 2018
DR.VINEET KOTHARI, J.ANDC.SARAVANAN,J.
ThisCivilMiscellaneous Petition is filed to condone the delay of
417 days in representation of the tax
case appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and on being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, we allow this Civil Miscellaneous Petition and condone the delay.
3. Registry is directed to number the Appeal and list the same for Admission today (20.09.2019).
vsm
(V.K.,J.) (C.S.N.,J.) 20-09-2019
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue